McDonald's Clothing

2009.07.19 19:19

McDonald's clothing

It’s not quite as severe as a tattoo, but you’d have to be pretty dedicated to McDonald’s to wear some apparel bearing the big yellow arches. But why? From a completely objective point of view, all brands are equal, whether they are electronics, cars, sodas, or fast food. Heck, these days it’s completely reasonable to wear a t-shirt for Reese’s, or some other brightly coloured candy brand.

I bring you a collection of retro clothing bearing the McDonald’s brand icons. »

Amusing, naturally, but something seems off here. Perhaps it’s simply the manner in which these photos are taken, as if McDonald’s is as normal a clothing producer as Sears or Benetton. Or was that just the norm for 80s mainstream fashion catalogues? Once again I profess how I will never understand fashion. Hell, I’m still trying to wrap my head around branding.

  • http://www.leschinskidesign.com John Leschinski

    I wore a Rondald McDonald shit as a kid all the time.

  • http://www.leschinskidesign.com John Leschinski

    I wore a Rondald McDonald shit as a kid all the time.

  • http://www.perezfox.com Prescott

    Yes, but looking back, isn’t that a rather strange thing to wear?

    I actually had a sleeveless t-shirt for “Clan of the Cave Bear” which is a very not-for-kids fantasy novel. Where did that even come from?

  • http://www.perezfox.com Prescott

    Yes, but looking back, isn’t that a rather strange thing to wear?

    I actually had a sleeveless t-shirt for “Clan of the Cave Bear” which is a very not-for-kids fantasy novel. Where did that even come from?

  • http://www.leschinskidesign.com John Leschinski

    As a kid I didn’t think anything of it. Looking back I’m a little taken back by it only becuase it’s not something I see everyday. I’m sure if they had kept it up and had people wearing their clothes like Nike or Pepsi has then I wouldn’t think twice.

  • http://www.leschinskidesign.com John Leschinski

    As a kid I didn’t think anything of it. Looking back I’m a little taken back by it only becuase it’s not something I see everyday. I’m sure if they had kept it up and had people wearing their clothes like Nike or Pepsi has then I wouldn’t think twice.

  • http://youtube.com/chrislineberry Chris Lineberry

    I think what’s peculiar about this ad is the disjuncture between the people and the clothing that they are wearing. Although oversized sweatshirts of the time were big (all puns intended), it seems as though the clothing isn’t made for the people “wearing” them. It’s like a face-in-the-hole where you suddenly become a large and muscular. However, the image into which these people are inserted is simply a latent unflattering result of brand loyalty to McDonald’s. In short, it’s a mask for the unhealthy turn that can be taken by devoting your body to the product. In fact, I don’t know if this was the policy of the time, but I know that it’s currently McDonald’s policy not to depict obese people in their ads and promotions. If this was the case in ’88, then I would hypothesize that this image veils the very people to which they are possibly marketing to. This is not to say that skinny people don’t eat McDonald’s, nor is it to say that obese people became such by eating the food, but rather the company is trying to attract an audience which they have forbidden themselves from explicitly representing. That’s just my take, though. There’s also a potential discussion on race and gender here, but maybe another day.

Search


Tip Jar

I will never feature advertising on this site. If you appreciate this blog and what I do, please consider a donation.

Donations handled securely via PayPal, no signup required.