No Logo (sort of)

You know how sports franchises have gone sponsorship mad over the past 50 years? Yea, well they take it seriously.
Brian Urlacher of the Chicago Bears was fined $100,000 for wearing a cap featuring the logo of a sponsor that was no officially sanctioned by the NFL. Read the AP story on ESPN.
This raises a few questions for debate: Is this fine excessive for doing something that was passive? It’s not like he came on the mic and said “This Bud’s For You”. Are sports teams going to have to censor everything in plain sight? What about the fans? Why do I fear the day when I won’t be allowed in a stadium if I am wearing an enemy brand. You never know, I might appear on TV at some point.
But, of course I can see the other side of the equation. Urlacher may have claimed to be innocent, but chances are he got paid more than the $100,000 fine. Like the ‘hefty’ fines for environmental dumping, it’s only money, and there’s plenty more where that came from.

Still, I don’t want pro sports in America to go the way of European clubs, where sponsorship is even more in-your-face and doesn’t even try to mascarade itself. With the exception of the World Cup, sponsors have their logo emblazened on the center of jerseys for both football and rugby — and easily twice the size of the team emblem. What’s with that? I don’t know which is more perverse — the fact that every fan of the team becomes an unwilling walking advert for some irrelevant brand, or the fact that they don’t mind?
I guess at the end of the day you have to ask yourself which you’d prefer: Stadiums named for absurd companies or logos in the middle of your shirt, whether you want it there or not.
What was I talking about again?